What does it mean that not all contradictions have resolutions?

Some genuine tensions must be managed rather than resolved.

Example: You value both deep focus and open-door collaboration. These aren't confused priorities — they're a genuine polarity. No amount of analysis will reveal that one is 'correct.' You manage them by oscillating: deep mornings, open afternoons. The tension never goes away. That's the point.

Try this: Identify one contradiction you've been trying to resolve for months or years. Write it as two poles: 'I value X' and 'I value Y.' Now ask: is this a problem to solve, or a polarity to manage? If no amount of new information would make one side permanently win, you're looking at an irresolvable tension. Design an oscillation strategy instead of searching for an answer.